Maternal Outcomes among Women Undergoing Cesarean Section at a Maternity Hospital in Mosul City, Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64554/nujms.2026.2.1.3Keywords:
Maternal post-operative complication; Cesarean section outcome; Maternal morbidity; Cesarean section safety.Abstract
Background: Cesarean section is commonly performed obstetric surgical procedure and has become an essential intervention for reducing maternal morbidity and mortality when vaginal delivery is not safe. It carries complications such as hemorrhage, need for blood transfusion, surgical site infection, uterine atony, admission to intensive care unit, and in severe cases, emergency hysterectomy or maternal death.
Objectives: highlighted on socio-demographic factors and its association on maternal out-come women underwent CS in maternity hospital in Mosul city.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1221 pregnant women underwent caesarian section in Al-Batool Teaching Maternity Hospital and Al-Mosul General Hospital, over a six months 1st (January–July) 2026. Using data collection form consisting from three sections: Socio-demographic, maternal cause of cesarian section and maternal outcome with closed ended question (yes and no) the mean score was used with cut off-point (1.5). The Z2 Proportion Test was used to compare different variable between two hospitals with 95% C.I. Chi-square continuity is used to compare between variables. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: It revealed 612 (50.1%) of study sample undergone caesarian section in age groups (21-30). Primary educational level was 591(48.4%) among study sample. Two third (62.8%) of participant were urban. Women underwent emergency C/S were 871 (71.3) and those with one scar were 565 (46.3%). The commonest maternal causes of cesarian section in Al
Batool Teaching Maternity Hospital were previous scar 350 (55.3%) and in Al-Mosul General Hospital was failure to progress 127 (21.65%). The most common maternal outcomes were intensive care unit admission (20.3%), uterine atony (8.3%), need for blood transfusion (8.2%) with P value (0.000). Highest maternal complication were seen among women with age group 40 years and more. ICU admission falls gradually from (29.9%) among illiterate mothers to (9.0%) among university and higher education mothers. Nearly two third of women with maternal complication were had no antenatal care and (48.6%) were multipara
Conclusion: Although nearly half of participant had had maternal outcome but mean score assessment of maternal outcome not reach cut off point. Its presence frequently associated with multipara, women aged more than 40, illiterate and those with absence of antenatal care that required adequate and frequent assessment during pregnancy with insurances of the continuous availability of blood products, uterotonic agents, and intensive care beds at both maternity hospitals to improve maternal outcome.
Downloads
References
1. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al. Williams Obstetrics. 26th ed. New York:
McGraw-Hill Education; 2022.
2. Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective cesarean section. Deutsches
Ärzteblatt International. 2015 Jul 20;112(29-30):489 –95.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4555060/pdf/Dtsch_Arztebl_Int-112-
0489.pdf
3. 3-Oxford Handbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Arulkumaran S, Symonds I, Fowlie A. Oxford Handbook of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2020.
4. Ali Y, Khan MW, Mumtaz U, Salman A, Muhammad N, Sabir M. Identification of
factors influencing the rise of cesarean sections rates in Pakistan, using MCDM. Int J
Health Care Qual Assur 2018;31(8):1058–1069, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-04-
2018-0087.
5. Molina G, Weiser TG, Lipsitz SR, et al. Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate
and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality. JAMA. 2015;314(21):2263–2270.
https://doi:10.1001/jama.2015.15553.
6. Thomaidi,S.;Sarantaki, A.; Tzitiridou Chatzopoulou, M.; Orovou, E.; Jotautis, V.;
Papoutsis, D. The Rising Global Cesarean Section Rates and Their Impact on Maternal
and Child Health: AScopingReview. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 8102. https://
doi.org/10.3390/jcm14228102.
7. Diaz V, Gialdini C, Chamillard M, Pasquale J, Carroli G, Torloni MR, Betran AP.
Evidence-based medical procedures to optimise caesarean outcomes: an overview of
systematic reviews. EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 1;83.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(25)00144-0/fulltext.
8. World Health Organization. WHO publishes surgical sub-group membership for
caesarean section recommendations. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
2025.WHO publishes surgical sub-group membership for caesarean section
recommendations
9. Khan MN, Alam MB, Khanam SJ, Islam MM, Billah MA. Trends, district-level
variations, and socioeconomic disparities in cesarean section delivery in Bangladesh.
Plos one. 2025 Oct 31;20(10):e0334931.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334931
10. Abdulnabi SF, Mohammadi M, Jabbari A, Ghorbani S, Nikpayam O, Flaifel HA. A
Comparative Study of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Obese and Non-obese Iraqi
Pregnant Women Undergoing Cesarean Section. Cureus. 2025 Mar
23;17(3). Doi: 10.7759/cureus.81039.
11. Ibrahim HK. Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Previous Cesarean Section: A
Retrospective Analysis. Journal Of Medicine And Surgery. 2023 Sep 25;2(9):14-20.
https://sarcouncil.com/download-article/SJM-162-2026-20-26.pdf
12. Alhawsawi E, Bahkali N, Aljadani S, Jambi A, Almwled A, Al Basri S. Implementation
of a crash cesarean section policy and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes at
King Abdulaziz University Hospital: A retrospective study. Medicine. 2024 Nov
29;103(48):e40645.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11608669/pdf/medi-103-e40645.pdf
13. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best
practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research:
a primer. Front Public Health 2018 Jun 11;6:149.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
14. Bolarinwa OA. Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of
questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015
Oct 1;22(4):195-2015. https://doi.org/ 10.4103/1117-1936.173959.
15. Gordis L. Epidemiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2008. p. 131–45.
16. Pavlidou E, Antasouras G, Papadopoulou SK, Alexatou O, Papandreou D, Mentzelou
M, et al. Association of maternal risk factors with the prevalence of caesarean section
deliveries: a cross-sectional study. Med Sci. 2023;11(4):66.
https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci11040066
17. Al-Fathy MYA, Al-Neema BA. Work and health status among married women during
child bearing age in Mosul city. M.Sc., [Thesis] in Community Medicine and Public
health. Mosul: Mosul University Press; 2008.
uring_Childbearing_Age_in_Mosul_City/links/5ec849a9a6fdcc90d68fa68a/Work-andHealth-Status-Among-Married-Women-During-Childbearing-Age-in-Mosul-City.pdf
18. Nilses C. Health in women of reproductive age: A survey in rural Zimbabwe. Ph.D
[Dissertations] in Medicine . Sweden: Uppsala University; 2000:30-40.
https://www.africabib.org/rec.php?RID=W00088246
19. Hilgeman C, Butts CT. Family Policy, Women's Employment, and Below-Replacement
Fertility in Developed Countries: A Hierarchical Bayesian Approach. Irvine: University
of California; 2006: 1-10.
20. Abdulrazzak M, Alshaghel MM, Alhashemi M, Mayo W, Oubari S, Roumi Jamal B, et
al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with cesarean section in Syria: a crosssectional study of the two largest health centers. Health Sci Rep. 2025;8(4):e70604.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70604.
21. Chen S. The Positive Effect of Women's Education on Fertility in Low-Fertility China.
Eur J Popul. 2022;38(1):125-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-021-09603-2.
22. Komuhangi A, Akello R, Izudi J. Determinants of a high prevalence of cesarean section
among women in eastern Uganda. Pan Afr Med J. 2023;46:90.
https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2023.46.90.38208.
23. Mohmed FE, Alanazi RK, Alosaimi NK, Haimed RA, Enani MA, Muhammad DM, et
al. Trends in Cesarean Section Rates and Indications over the Last 5 Years in a Tertiary
Center. Journal of Tazeez for Public Health. 2026;3(2).
https://doi.org/10.65759/cjywxd24.
24. Guner G, Karabudak CB. Caesarean section rates and indications: a cross-sectional
study from a tertiary care center in Türkiye. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
2025;26(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-08494-z.
25. Moini A, Riazi K, Ebrahimi A, Ostovan N. Caesarean section rates in teaching hospitals
of Tehran: 1999-2003. EMHJ 2007;13(2):457-
460. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/117267 .
26. Al-Fathy MY, Barhawi RYS, Al-Rawee RY. Trends of Maternal Mortality in Nineveh
Government (2018-2022) A time Series Analysis. Trends Gen Med. 2023; 1(1): 1-13
27. Harrison MS, Garces A, Figueroa L, Esamai F, Bucher S, Bose C, et al. Caesarean birth
by maternal request: a poorly understood phenomenon in low-and middle-income
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ninevah University Journal of Medical Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.